Triadic dualism is an idea that was not and now is. It is exceptional in that it is a simple form of perception, something actually seen. There are arrangements of trees, flower parts and body forms which exhibit triadic dualism and which were in existence prior to the concept of triadic dualism. Did they contain triadic dualism before the concept and awareness of triadic dualism existed. This is not a question for an explicit answer but rather a point for reflection.

The classical concept of vision was that the eyes send out rays which uncover the object of perception. Isn't triadic dualism something like that? The mind projects triadic dualism into the subject of perception, provided, generally, that some aspect of the subject permits the imposition of triadic dualism. And the same subject will contian triadic dualism for one observor who happens to be aware of the concept but not for another who has never heard of triadic dulism.

There is also the possibility, even the probability, of an implicit recognition of triadic dualism by those who do not consciously know the concept but are affected by some sense of the specialness of certain forms and arrangements. It is clear that triadic dualism or something which can now be caleld triadic dualism has been used by painters and architects even inc ases where there was a choice of design not necessarily driven by functional necessity, as perhaps the triadic dualisms of wenches and wrenches may be.